Earthquake Hazards: Liquefaction

With the focus on earthquakes so often on the shaking and potential infrastructure and building damage, there are other hazards the shaking causes that are sometimes overlooked or minimized. One of those hazards is liquefaction.

Liquefaction is one of the earthquake hazards I'm more concerned about where I live because according to the liquefaction-potential maps, my home is in an area with high liquefaction probability. 

So, what is liquefaction?  

When soil is saturated, or partially saturated, it can act like a liquid when it is sufficiently agitated or shaken (like, by an earthquake). Loose sand and silt-based soils are most susceptible.

As the earth shakes, the soil loses its strength and stiffness and begins to behave more like a liquid, where anything on the surface could sink or move. Even the liquefaction of buried layers of soil can cause these problems.

As a side note, one of the parables taught by Jesus in the New Testament (Matthew 7:24-27) was about a wise man building his house on a rock, and a foolish man building his house on the sand. In the parable the rains and floods came and caused the house built on the sand to fall. 

Well, the same can happen in an earthquake. Buildings not built over a solid subsurface (like bedrock) are much more susceptible to the effects of soil liquefaction.

Effects of liquefaction include:

  • loss of the soil’s ability to support structures;
  • lateral spreading, as the ground over a buried liquefied layer could slide down a gentle slope;
  • sand boils that can be ejected from a buried liquefied layer, forming sand volcanoes, with nearby ground settling and fracturing;
  • flow failures can occur down steep slopes, resulting in a large displacement of material, much like a landslide;
  • ground oscillation, which happens when the surface layer is shaken back and forth over a buried liquefied layer, resulting in the possible deformation of the surface;
  • flotation may occur as light objects buried in the ground, such as pipelines and sewers, can float to the surface when surrounded by liquefied soil; and
  • settlement can occur when the liquified ground surface settles or subsides after the shaking stops and the ground becomes firm again, which is particularly bothersome if your car, or other object, had sunk into the ground.

The good (or bad) news is liquefaction is more likely to occur in prolonged periods of ground shaking. It's unlikely a short quake will cause much, if any liquefaction.

However, there is no definitive time minimum of how long the ground must shake before liquefaction occurs. Ground composition (what's in the ground), soil saturation (how much water/moisture is in the ground), and other conditions can all play a role in how quickly, or slowly, liquefaction occurs.

Liquefaction at Niigata, Japan, 16 June 1964. Public domain, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Liquefaction_at_Niigata.JPG
Magnitude 7.5-7.6 quake in Niigata, Japan, 16 June 1964 caused liquefaction 

An earthquake with moment magnitude of about 7.6 struck Niigata, Japan, on 16 June 1964. The epicenter was about 31 miles (50km) north, with the hypocenter about 21 miles (34km) deep. The poor sub-soil conditions led to extension liquefaction across the city. Much of the city was built on unconsolidated sand and deltaic soil deposits from the Shinano and Agano rivers. The perceived intensity was about VIII (severe). Eyewitnesses of the Showa bridge collapse reported the failure started about 70 seconds after the earthquake started. Lateral spreading from liquefaction under the bridge piers is considered the main cause of the collapse.

The Niigata quake also caused fires and flooding, with most of the flooding from some tsunamis/

Showa bridge collapse. Public domain, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Showa_bridge_Niigata_NGDC.JPG

The 7.1 magnitude 4 September 2010, earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand demonstrated multiple effects of liquefaction. A subsequent 6.3 magnitude quake on 21 February 2011 further caused damage to the already weakened infrastructure. 2011 Christchurch Earthquake Wikipedia article

Storm drains were pushed up through roads as liquefaction caused underground pipes to rise up.

Liquefaction caused storm drain to push up after 2010 Canterbury earthquake
Liquefaction caused road damage. Martin Luff, 5 Sep 2010. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en

Liquefaction on road caused water and silt to come up from underground
St Andrews College, Papaui Road liquefaction. Tim, 22 Feb 2011. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en 

The United States Geological Survey (USGS) has various earthquake hazards maps, including liquefaction maps. The USGS, various state agencies, universities, and other organizations have identified areas at greatest risk of liquefaction. Many liquefaction potential maps are available online, if you’re interested in knowing what your risk is.

Here's a linked image to the liquefaction-potential map for part of Salt Lake City, Utah.

Liquefaction potential for part of Salt Lake County, Utah. https://geodata.geology.utah.gov/pages/view.php?ref=12771
Liquefaction potential for part of Salt Lake County, Utah. https://geodata.geology.utah.gov/pages/view.php?ref=12771



Northern Santa Clara Valley, California liquefaction hazard maps, USGS. These maps show the likelihood of a liquefaction for several earthquake scenarios; a magnitude 7.8 earthquake on the northernmost segments of the San Andreas fault, a magnitude 6.7 on Hayward Fault, and a 6.9 quake on the Calaveras fault.

An interesting article, Predicting post-seismic liquefaction through geological response analysis for those who are interested in where some of the research is heading.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Wasatch Fault Earthquake Scenario

Image
 This scenario literally hits home for me. I live along Utah's Wasatch Fault and while I don't think the epicenter of the next Big One will be too close to where I live, the effects of this big earthquake will seriously affect my life and the lives of my wife, children, and many of my extended family. Most people have only "seen" the effects of a big earthquake from the media, either news or movies. It's different to personally feel a big earthquake and see the aftermath. For lack of a better descriptor, it possible effects of a Big One become real. Because a Big One one the Wasatch Fault is more personal, I've done more research on it. And, interestingly, information on a Wasatch Fault earthquake scenario is easier to find. Maybe that's just my bias. It's not that you can't find earthquake threat information for other parts of the country, it's finding actual scenario "what ifs" and loss estimations that are based in scientific data....
Read more

Earthquake Hazards: Surface Fault Rupture

Image
 A fault rupture is a slip and resulting displacement along a fault. When that rupture extends to the earth’s surface, where we can see it, it’s called a surface rupture. These surface fault ruptures can be vertical or horizontal, and can happen in a small location or extend over a larger area. In many earthquake hazards, surface fault ruptures are identified as ground displacement. Not all earthquakes will produce surface ruptures. The biggest problem with surface ruptures is when a building or other structure is over the rupture. California passed the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act in 1972 to mitigate surface ruptures. The Act prevents the construction of human-occupied buildings on the surface of active faults.  Outside of California, many other earthquake hazard locations don’t have statutes regulating development on faults with surface rupture potential. The main reason for the lack of regulations is usually a lack of historical evidence of earthquakes rupturi...
Read more

San Francisco Earthquake Scenario

Image
An earthquake scenario for the San Francisco area is one of the scenarios where finding more recent information is difficult. For an actual scenario, the best I could find was from a simulation in 2006. There was also some information from a 2008 ShakeOut Scenario. There are more recent earthquake hazard and risk calculations available, but I have yet to find these risks and hazards incorporated into a full scenario, where costs and losses are calculated for the earthquake. While the details may be a little different, the whole purpose of this, and other scenarios, is to help you start to grasp the magnitude of damage and loss that a large earthquake can cause. And will very likely cause. Remember that California has generally had better earthquake building codes for a longer time than most of the rest of the United States. An earthquake of a much lesser magnitude can have just as much (if not more) damage and losses in an area where the buildings and infrastructure are not as prepared...
Read more