Look for coming posts on earthquake scenarios

 Thank you for taking some time to read my blog. As I'm sure it is with you, life is busy for me. 

While it's been several weeks since my last post, I wanted to let you know that I have five posts in the works. 

These forthcoming posts are earthquake scenarios for five of the potentially biggest "big ones" projected to strike the contiguous United States.

No, these scenarios are not fictional case studies. Nor are they hyped up Hollywood-style disaster stories.

These earthquake scenarios are based on projected risks and cost estimations made by state and federal experts. These experts use knowledge and experience from what is known about earthquake risks and hazards, often through historical and similar event references, in an effort to best calculate the potential and expected damage an earthquake or a projected magnitude will cause in an area.

It's not if and earthquake strikes but when, how hard, and how might it affect the area. 

Some of the scenarios are based on information that is over a decade old. Other information is more recent. From what I can discover, the expected and projected effects in older scenarios is still considered relevant, with the only real difference being the big one will likely affect a larger population and more infrastructure.

These scenarios are what I find interesting, particularly when it comes to preparedness. It is from my research of these large earthquake scenarios that I learned one of the most important pieces of preparedness is being water prepared. Of all critical infrastructure, culinary water delivery is among the most susceptible to having problems as the result of an earthquake and it is often expected to take the longest to restore.

Other areas of preparedness are important, but water too often takes a lower priority.

In the aftermath of a disaster the aid lines for getting drinking water are expected.

After the volcanic eruption in Tonga this past weekend, with the tsunami and related damage, lots of aid is getting shipped to that country but one of the greatest needs is drinkable water.

Update 16 February 2022, the last two weeks two scenarios have been posted.

San Francisco Earthquake Scenario

San Andreas Earthquake Scenario

Update 6 April 2022, another scenario was added. This one has a little more information because there seems to be more research freely available and it would literally hit closer to home for me.

Wasatch Fault (Salt Lake City) Earthquake Scenario

Two more scenarios are in the works...

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Wasatch Fault Earthquake Scenario

Image
 This scenario literally hits home for me. I live along Utah's Wasatch Fault and while I don't think the epicenter of the next Big One will be too close to where I live, the effects of this big earthquake will seriously affect my life and the lives of my wife, children, and many of my extended family. Most people have only "seen" the effects of a big earthquake from the media, either news or movies. It's different to personally feel a big earthquake and see the aftermath. For lack of a better descriptor, it possible effects of a Big One become real. Because a Big One one the Wasatch Fault is more personal, I've done more research on it. And, interestingly, information on a Wasatch Fault earthquake scenario is easier to find. Maybe that's just my bias. It's not that you can't find earthquake threat information for other parts of the country, it's finding actual scenario "what ifs" and loss estimations that are based in scientific data....
Read more

Earthquake Hazards: Surface Fault Rupture

Image
 A fault rupture is a slip and resulting displacement along a fault. When that rupture extends to the earth’s surface, where we can see it, it’s called a surface rupture. These surface fault ruptures can be vertical or horizontal, and can happen in a small location or extend over a larger area. In many earthquake hazards, surface fault ruptures are identified as ground displacement. Not all earthquakes will produce surface ruptures. The biggest problem with surface ruptures is when a building or other structure is over the rupture. California passed the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act in 1972 to mitigate surface ruptures. The Act prevents the construction of human-occupied buildings on the surface of active faults.  Outside of California, many other earthquake hazard locations don’t have statutes regulating development on faults with surface rupture potential. The main reason for the lack of regulations is usually a lack of historical evidence of earthquakes rupturi...
Read more

San Francisco Earthquake Scenario

Image
An earthquake scenario for the San Francisco area is one of the scenarios where finding more recent information is difficult. For an actual scenario, the best I could find was from a simulation in 2006. There was also some information from a 2008 ShakeOut Scenario. There are more recent earthquake hazard and risk calculations available, but I have yet to find these risks and hazards incorporated into a full scenario, where costs and losses are calculated for the earthquake. While the details may be a little different, the whole purpose of this, and other scenarios, is to help you start to grasp the magnitude of damage and loss that a large earthquake can cause. And will very likely cause. Remember that California has generally had better earthquake building codes for a longer time than most of the rest of the United States. An earthquake of a much lesser magnitude can have just as much (if not more) damage and losses in an area where the buildings and infrastructure are not as prepared...
Read more